<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Tenement Halls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/2004/10/04/and-tenement-halls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/2004/10/04/and-tenement-halls/</link>
	<description>The internet is a huge bathroom wall, and any halfwit with a keyboard and a connection has an opportunity to scrawl on it. Take me, for instance. My name is KZ.  For a good time, come find me at Prosaic Shades of Gray.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Urbanek</title>
		<link>http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/2004/10/04/and-tenement-halls/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Urbanek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/?p=194#comment-619</guid>
		<description>What does it take to get a blog noticed? Just word of mouth? Is there a difference between a personal column using a free or cheepie blog site and a more formal opinion website with a .com or .org URL? 
 
I have a &quot;Blog&quot; and two websites: 
 
www.al-qaeda-wins.blogspot.com 
www.sunkingjournal.com 
www.tonyahardingshotjfk.com 
 
The latter has received about 33,000 hits in three years but interest has lagged in recent months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it take to get a blog noticed? Just word of mouth? Is there a difference between a personal column using a free or cheepie blog site and a more formal opinion website with a .com or .org URL? </p>
<p>I have a &#8220;Blog&#8221; and two websites: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.al-qaeda-wins.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.al-qaeda-wins.blogspot.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.sunkingjournal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sunkingjournal.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tonyahardingshotjfk.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tonyahardingshotjfk.com</a> </p>
<p>The latter has received about 33,000 hits in three years but interest has lagged in recent months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siona</title>
		<link>http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/2004/10/04/and-tenement-halls/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Siona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/?p=194#comment-618</guid>
		<description>When I initially read your post, though, I was reminded of an article I read recently in the Mercury news. (I&#039;m pretty sure it was an editorial; the writer had come strong views.) Essentially, it was argued that the recent spate of shoddy journalism (the biases, the news-twisting, the falsifications, the lies) was the result - in many ways - of blogging. 
 
Ridiculous, right? The author felt that bloggers, who wrote without any pretensions of objectivity, were leading the public to expect a subjective view point, and were causing people to read only that which they believed in. I thought this was pretty absurd: the greater amounts of blogs don&#039;t get read, and those that do, whilst influential, are hardly shaping the world of journalism. I do think it&#039;s important to have these independent news sources, but I do agree: the majority of the American public could care less. It&#039;s just too much information, in more ways than one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I initially read your post, though, I was reminded of an article I read recently in the Mercury news. (I&#8217;m pretty sure it was an editorial; the writer had come strong views.) Essentially, it was argued that the recent spate of shoddy journalism (the biases, the news-twisting, the falsifications, the lies) was the result &#8211; in many ways &#8211; of blogging. </p>
<p>Ridiculous, right? The author felt that bloggers, who wrote without any pretensions of objectivity, were leading the public to expect a subjective view point, and were causing people to read only that which they believed in. I thought this was pretty absurd: the greater amounts of blogs don&#8217;t get read, and those that do, whilst influential, are hardly shaping the world of journalism. I do think it&#8217;s important to have these independent news sources, but I do agree: the majority of the American public could care less. It&#8217;s just too much information, in more ways than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siona</title>
		<link>http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/2004/10/04/and-tenement-halls/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Siona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/?p=194#comment-617</guid>
		<description>I have a few things to say, although I&#039;ll first beg to differ with Diana. All blogs are not grand and important! If you need evidence of this, allow me to direct you to exhibit A: the &#039;next blog&#039; box at the top of &#039;Prosaic Shades of Gray.&#039; There are a disproportionate number of middle and high school teeny-poppers with penchants for using numeral instead of words and for swearing about their parents. It&#039;s depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a few things to say, although I&#8217;ll first beg to differ with Diana. All blogs are not grand and important! If you need evidence of this, allow me to direct you to exhibit A: the &#8216;next blog&#8217; box at the top of &#8216;Prosaic Shades of Gray.&#8217; There are a disproportionate number of middle and high school teeny-poppers with penchants for using numeral instead of words and for swearing about their parents. It&#8217;s depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/2004/10/04/and-tenement-halls/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosaicshadesofgray.com/?p=194#comment-616</guid>
		<description>I believe everybody&#039;s blog is important. It shows the views and feelings of a person. Even if it doesnt always have to do with national issues and such, it shows you an entire life of someone else. So many people have such interesting lives and it&#039;s sorta like stepping into another world when you read someone else&#039;s blog. Political bloggers are important and all but so are the so-called &quot;mundane&quot; ones. But yeah, i don&#039;t think the media sees it the same way I do. But never think your blog is any less. All blogs are great and important!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe everybody&#8217;s blog is important. It shows the views and feelings of a person. Even if it doesnt always have to do with national issues and such, it shows you an entire life of someone else. So many people have such interesting lives and it&#8217;s sorta like stepping into another world when you read someone else&#8217;s blog. Political bloggers are important and all but so are the so-called &#8220;mundane&#8221; ones. But yeah, i don&#8217;t think the media sees it the same way I do. But never think your blog is any less. All blogs are great and important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 253/258 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.prosaicshadesofgray.com @ 2012-02-09 21:56:07 -->
